Hi Andreas, On 2019-04-08 12:50, Fuchs, Andreas wrote: Does this apply only to release candidates, or to the final releases as well? - For the RCs, I don't mind at all. - For the stable releases, it is somewhat convenient (but not critical) to have (verifiable) distribution tarballs as this allows to skip installing autoconf-archive and pandoc (since the files these generate are already included in the tarball). This is especially nice in case of pandoc with its many Haskell dependencies. Kind regards, Jonas

Yes I only referred to the rcs... Releases will still contain signed tar balls. Cheers, Andreas ________________________________________ From: tpm2 [tpm2-bounces(a)lists.01.org] on behalf of Peter Korsgaard [peter(a)korsgaard.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2019 18:54 To: Jonas Witschel Cc: tpm2(a)lists.01.org Subject: Re: [tpm2] tpm2-totp release candidate v0.1.2-rc0 Andreas explictly wrote release candidates, so presumably this not for the final releases. For releases, having real distribution tarballs is also preferable for us (Buildroot). -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ tpm2 mailing list tpm2(a)lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/tpm2