On Fr, 2011-06-17 at 09:13 +0100, Salvatore Iovene wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:40:07 +0200
Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> wrote:
> Translating the 404 error into 401 is too aggressive. It should only
> be done if the path for which the error was triggered really was the
> one where %u was substituted.
do you mean any path that includes the username or just the path that
we access for the first time AND it includes the username?
"first time" and "includes the username". Once we have identified
correct credentials and the corresponding path, reporting 401 would just
IMHO, of course. Google itself even has it in their help pages somewhere
that credentials may have to be entered multiple times although they
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.