On Sa, 2012-01-21 at 22:14 +0100, Martin Ott wrote: Not at the moment. For someone who isn't afraid of touching and recompile the source code it wouldn't be hard to add. A new class very similar to src/backends/webdav/CardDAVSource.h/cpp would be needed. The implementation of the WebDAVSource callbacks would be almost identical to CalDAVSource, the only difference is that the class needs to pick collections containing VTODO, whereas CalDAVSource picks collections containing VEVENT. The rest of such a CalDAVTodoSource would be much simpler (= as in CardDAVSource) because each item can contain only one VTODO, in contrast to the multiple VEVENTs that can be in a calendar item. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.

On So, 2012-01-22 at 19:14 +0100, Martin Ott wrote: This list is a good start. You can also file a more formal feature request in the MeeGo Bugzilla, see http://syncevolution.org/support -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.