On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 17:53 +0100, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote: No, that's not supported. Do you want the SyncEvolution SyncML server to be used without any per-user configuration? In other words, tell it to act as bridge and then let it be used automatically by different users? That's not what it was designed for. It's more like a "personal SyncML server" where each user configures and runs is own instance of it. Even adding new devices of that one user has to be done manually. It could be done, but would require quite a bit of work for defining how to automate the necessary config steps and implementing that. You are welcome to contribute that. In the meantime, have a look at the recent email exchange with Christof - he went through the same process. The -bundle does intentionally not depend on everything that is needed. It's a bit hacky, but I'd rather not force other users to install something that they don't need. Yes, that's a bit strange. You should see a message about a missing config for this client and then be able to create that config, as described here: https://syncevolution.org/wiki/http-server-howto At this point you need to also set databaseUser, databasePassword and database for the "calendar" and "addressbook" source in the @myservicename context. This is probably from the instructions for setting up a local sync. That's not needed for acting as a SyncML bridge. Instead have a look at the README and how it configures a SyncML client inside the @myservicename context, using the "calendar" and "addressbook" source configured there earlier. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.