On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 23:12 +0100, Jeffrey Perry wrote: Intel QA runs tests with Bluetooth sync. They don't test the HTTP server. We (= developers) could and should test the SyncEvolution HTTP server like we do with other SyncML servers in the nightly testing, but we haven't set that up yet. I'm not sure how you counted those. What we have and use a lot is the automated testing of SyncEvolution as client with various third-party HTTP SyncML servers. Not yet. The same tests could be used for both, but they need be parameterized differently (many phones are too dumb to handle the same data as SyncML servers). I'm also not sure how to integrate phone testing with the nightly test runs - place all phones next to the server in the machine room?! Not possible right now, with the server in a remote location ;-} The SyncML server is indeed the same. Who initiates the connection and what transport is used is the main difference, see http://syncevolution.org/development/direct-synchronization-aka-syncml-se... \ -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.

On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 00:16 +0100, Jeff wrote: Various SyncML semantic related tests (different sync modes, update/delete/add). Large items. Sending various items to the server and back, then check for data loss ("testItems", test data is in test/testdata). For a full list you would have to look at the source. If you want to maximize the bang for the buck, then focus on the data and properties that you want to have synchronized. We might not have that covered by our tests. That ends up counting tests multiple times, as they are parameterized: each test runs once for each data source alone, then also with all sources enabled. For historic reasons, they are also enabled in two different orders. This used to make a difference when using the Funambol engine, not sure whether it still has an effect with Synthesis as engine. In principle, yes, although it is more the other way around: the tests were originally written for HTTP servers, now they can be reused for phones. We run tests against HTTP servers regularly, but not yet against phones. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.