Re: [SyncEvolution] aborting before sending outgoing message?

Hi! Another question around this: suspending is done so that we wait until we have a message to process, then tell the engine to suspend with STEPCMD_SUSPEND, afterwards directly call it again with STEPCMD_GOTDATA. But in the TransportAgent::FAILED case there is also a stepCmd = STEPCMD_SUSPEND, which bypasses that logic. Does that really work? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.