Re: [SyncEvolution] single source for documentation (MBC #690)
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 09:15 +0100, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
On 04/28/2010 04:49 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Attached is a copy. What do you think about these changes? Any spelling
> mistakes, unclear statements, etc.?
I've read it through and it looks pretty good. I mean, it is really long
but for man page and README that makes sense: the subject matter is
complex and the text gives a thorough description as it should.
That said, I might not be the best evaluator for how thorough it is and
whether it has any unspoken "required knowledge", having worked on a
client for some time... If there's anyone on the list who is interested
in syncevolution and would like to contribute: Now is an excellent time,
previous experience not required: just read and comment.
"Silence is golden" - let's go ahead with the current text in 1.0. I'd
like to minimize changes at this time, so I won't touch the builtin
usage information, but for 1.1 the same text should also be used for
"syncevolution --help".
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.