On 08. aug. 2012 10:48, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 10:17 +0200, Ove Kåven wrote:
> What made you choose to use time-based change tracking in KCalExtended
> if you don't like it?
The backend started as a skunk work project to work with and verify the
calendar API in MeeGo at a time when SyncEvolution wasn't the official
sync solution for MeeGo. Because the native sync solution was using
time-based change tracking, it made sense to test that.
I never got around to changing it later. It wasn't relevant until you
picked it up for the N9 port of SyncEvolution.
Right. Do you think it's best if I look at converting it to