On Sa, 2011-03-05 at 11:02 +0000, Thomas Pequet wrote:
Can you send me exactly the links where you have done the tests,
because I do not where to see ...
And explain me again the problem ?
Here's the problem description with updated links:
Some tests related to sending an updated event or task to the server
which fail (testUpdate, testAddUpdate). What I see is that client A
sends an updated to the server. Then client B syncs in two-way and
should be sent that update, but doesn't get it:
Add item log:
[2011-02-05 11:14:29.750] RECEIVED STATUS 201 for for command 'Add' (outgoing
Send update log:
[2011-02-05 11:15:08.678] RECEIVED STATUS 200 for for command 'Replace' (outgoing
[2011-02-05 11:15:12.237] Successful end of session -> calling engFinishDataStoreSync()
for datastores now
Receive update log (without the update):
[2011-02-05 11:15:22.313] ---- System time in UTC : 2011-02-05 11:15:22.313
A different test (testAddUpdate) which adds the item from client A and
then updates it from A before sending to B implies that the item doesn't
seem to be updated on the server (client B gets the old data) - I
haven't verified that in the web interface, though.
The time stamps on the client show that the last session with client B
starts 10 seconds after the end of the previous session with client A,
and roughly 14 seconds after the item was updated on the server.
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.