Re: [SyncEvolution] libsynthesis_srv

On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 22:25 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: The next nonce is indeed not saved. I'm not exactly sure how this is supposed to work. What I see is this: TSyError Session_SaveNonce( CContext sContext, cAppCharP nonce ) { TSyError err= DB_NotFound; SessionContext* sc= SeC( sContext ); DEBUG_DB ( sc->fCB, MyDB, Se_SN, "%d '%s'", sc,nonce ); if (sc->fDev) { sc->fDev->fToken= nonce; err= sc->fDevList.SaveDB( true, sc->fCB ); // save it } // if return err; } /* Session_SaveNonce */ It gets called, but sc->fDevList.SaveDB() doesn't do anything because sc->fDevList.fChanged is false. Is there some kind of UpdateField() or UpdateFields() call missing which updates the fDev entry in fDevList before calling SaveDB? There is such a call in Session_SaveDeviceInfo(), but that function is never called. I tried disabling password checking via <plugin_sessionauth>no</plugin_sessionauth> <requestedauth>none</requestedauth> <requiredauth>none</requiredauth> <autononce>yes</autononce> but then I still get an authentication error: * [2009-09-28 15:48:30.315] getAuthNonce: current auth nonce='L>3UZ!!!' * [2009-09-28 15:48:30.315] Authorization failed (invalid credentials) sending 401 + chal * [2009-09-28 15:48:30.315] Challenge for next auth: AuthType=(null), Nonce='RSTL?"!!', binary allowed Where do I find the implementation of <requestedauth>none</requestedauth>? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.