On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 12:10 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
This does not yet address the situation where the remote side also
wasn't changed. A redundant Replace command will be sent in that case.
Do you have a hint for me how this can be avoided? In the server case,
is it as simple as avoiding the SendItemAsServer(augmentedItemP)
That really seems to do the trick. Does the attached patch look right?
It works for me (TM).
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.