12:49 p.m.
The setup is the default setup of NVMf target with Direct attached Subsystem. The FIO
plugin was at the target side and the IOPS from SPDK was found to be around 2.5K and the
IOPS from kernel was found to be 100k.
Regards,
Param.
On 06-Dec-2016, at 5:57 PM, Andrey Kuzmin
<andrey.v.kuzmin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, 15:24 Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel <krath(a)cloudsimple.com
<mailto:krath@cloudsimple.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
Is there any benchmarking done to prove that SPDK is better than the Kernel driver?
We did run the sample driver provided from the SPDK and compared with the kernel
interface and found that SPDK is very slow. We did run FIO.
It's worth publishing your setup and results first.
Regards,
Andrey
Can you describe the setup for the performance measurement between Kernel and SPDK
driver.
Regards,
Param.
_______________________________________________
SPDK mailing list
SPDK(a)lists.01.org <mailto:SPDK@lists.01.org>
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk
<https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk>
--
Regards,
Andrey
_______________________________________________
SPDK mailing list
SPDK(a)lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk