Thanks for continuing to work on this, the progress sounds encouraging! I haven’t looked at it yet but it seems like there are
opportunities beyond Cyborg for this and I have to admit I don’t totally see how SPDK, as a SW solution, fits the Cyborg model. As with my last comment on your patch I think it would be great if you could explain your vision a bit more both with Cyborg and
beyond. I believe this would generate more interest in getting some eyes on this. Personally I will make a commitment to look at it before the end of the week.
On Behalf Of We We
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 6:46 AM
To: Storage Performance Development Kit <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: [SPDK] Add py-spdk client for SPDK
I have submitted the py-spdk code on
https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/379741/, please take some time to visit it, I will be very grateful to you.
The py-spdk is client which can help the upper-level app to communicate with the SPDK-based app (such as: nvmf_tgt, vhost, iscsi_tgt,
etc.). Should I submit it into the other repo I rebuild rather than SPDK repo? Because I think it is a relatively independent kit upon the SPDK.
If you have some thoughts about the py-spdk, please share with me.