Thanks for continuing to work on this, the progress sounds encouraging! I haven't
looked at it yet but it seems like there are opportunities beyond Cyborg for this and I
have to admit I don't totally see how SPDK, as a SW solution, fits the Cyborg model.
As with my last comment on your patch I think it would be great if you could explain your
vision a bit more both with Cyborg and beyond. I believe this would generate more
interest in getting some eyes on this. Personally I will make a commitment to look at it
before the end of the week.
From: SPDK [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of We We
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 6:46 AM
To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org>
Subject: [SPDK] Add py-spdk client for SPDK
I have submitted the py-spdk code on https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/379741/
, please take
some time to visit it, I will be very grateful to you.
The py-spdk is client which can help the upper-level app to communicate with the
SPDK-based app (such as: nvmf_tgt, vhost, iscsi_tgt, etc.). Should I submit it into the
other repo I rebuild rather than SPDK repo? Because I think it is a relatively independent
kit upon the SPDK.
If you have some thoughts about the py-spdk, please share with me.