Hi Mastumoto San,

For "dynamically managing", I did not mean to change SPDK on the fly, but perform life cycle management on SPDK based application as a whole.

With that said, I think if cyborg-db could persist SPDK application meta/config data,  might be helpful :) 

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:56 AM, 松本周平 / MATSUMOTO,SHUUHEI <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com> wrote:

Hi WeWe, Paul,


As long as I understand, currently SPDK read configuration from configuration file and keep configuration only in memory.

SPDK does not have nonvolatile dynamically changeable configuration database yet.


Developing configuration database into SPDK will be cumbersome.

If Cyborg takes that role, we may be able to get one simple storage system.


This is just an idea I have not pursued this yet.


Thanks,

Shuhei




差出人: SPDK <spdk-bounces@lists.01.org> が Luse, Paul E <paul.e.luse@intel.com> の代理で送信
送信日時: 2018年1月11日 10:37
宛先: Storage Performance Development Kit
件名: [!]Re: [SPDK] Add py-spdk client for SPDK
 

Hi WeWe,

 

Thanks for continuing to work on this, the progress sounds encouraging! I haven’t looked at it yet but it seems like there are opportunities beyond Cyborg for this and I have to admit I don’t totally see how SPDK, as a SW solution, fits the Cyborg model.  As with my last comment on your patch I think it would be great if you could explain your vision a bit more both with Cyborg and beyond.  I believe this would generate more interest in getting some eyes on this.  Personally I will make a commitment to look at it before the end of the week.

 

Thanks again!

Paul

 

From: SPDK [mailto:spdk-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of We We
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 6:46 AM
To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk@lists.01.org>
Subject: [SPDK] Add py-spdk client for SPDK

 

Hi, all

I have submitted the py-spdk code on https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/379741/, please take some time to visit it, I will be very grateful to you. 

The py-spdk is client which can help the upper-level app to communicate with the SPDK-based app (such as: nvmf_tgt, vhost, iscsi_tgt, etc.). Should I submit it into the other repo I rebuild rather than SPDK repo? Because I think it is a relatively independent kit upon the SPDK. 

 

If you have some thoughts about the py-spdk, please share with me.

 

Regards,

Helloway


_______________________________________________
SPDK mailing list
SPDK@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk




--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado