[SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab

Hi Tomek, I do not think we have a specific reason for disabling vhost. I can look into enabling it and get back to you on that.

Thanks, Brandon On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 4:18 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki(a)intel.com&gt; wrote: > > Hi, > > As Aaron noted this was result of rte_ethdev depending on rte_net. > On SPDK side rte_net was included in default compilation with vhost > component, but since vhost is disabled in the UNH lab tests with > SPDK it showed up as missing. A fix for that is now submitted to > SPDK: > https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6398 > I'll let you know when it makes it's way to the v21.01.x branch. > > @Brandon Lo General question, is there particular reason to disable > vhost [configure argument '--without-vhost'] in the UNH lab tests > with SPDK ? > I don't recall any identified issue and enabling it would increase > the coverage of the compilation tests. > > Thanks, > Tomek > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Aaron Conole <aconole(a)redhat.com&gt; > > Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 3:02 PM > > To: Brandon Lo <blo(a)iol.unh.edu&gt; > > Cc: Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki(a)intel.com&gt;; Lincoln Lavoie > > <lylavoie(a)iol.unh.edu&gt;; dpdklab(a)iol.unh.edu; ci(a)dpdk.org; dev(a)dpdk.org; > > spdk(a)lists.01.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures > > @ DPDK community lab > > > > Brandon Lo <blo(a)iol.unh.edu&gt; writes: > > > > > Hi again everyone, > > > > > > I have checked the pipelines with SPDK branch v21.01.x on the main DPDK > > branch. > > > It still seems to have an issue with compilation, and I have attached > > > a log of a Fedora SPDK compilation. > > > There are some undefined references to "rte_ether_unformat_addr" > > > I will continue to look into this. If you have any ideas on how to fix > > > this, please let me know. > > > > Looks like rte_ethdev depends on rte_net - maybe I missed something. > > > > Brandon, can we disable this test for the time being since it's been failing for > > a while now? Can you also send me the container image / definitions you're > > using so that I can help work on this? > > > > > Thanks, > > > Brandon > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:07 AM Brandon Lo <blo(a)iol.unh.edu&gt; wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi everyone, > > >> > > >> I will adjust the branches and watch over the first few pipelines to > > >> make sure everything goes smoothly. > > >> > > >> Thanks for the update, > > >> Brandon > > >> > > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Aaron Conole <aconole(a)redhat.com&gt; > > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > "Zawadzki, Tomasz" <tomasz.zawadzki(a)intel.com&gt; writes: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi Lincoln, > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > That patch in question is now merged to branch v21.01.x. > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > Good to know - I do still see a failure in the IOL job (even from a > > >> > few hours ago). I suppose the lab side might need some adjustment, > > too? > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > The builds performed for latest SPDK and SPDK LTS, against > > >> > > dpdk-main branch seem to be passing. Would love to hear if this > > >> > > is what you are seeing on your end too. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > >> > > Tomek > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie(a)iol.unh.edu&gt; > > >> > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:21 PM > > >> > > To: Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki(a)intel.com&gt; > > >> > > Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole(a)redhat.com&gt;; Brandon Lo > > >> > > <blo(a)iol.unh.edu&gt;; dpdklab(a)iol.unh.edu; ci(a)dpdk.org; > > >> > > dev(a)dpdk.org; spdk(a)lists.01.org > > >> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures > > >> > > @ DPDK community lab > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks Tomek, > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make sure > > >> > > the next set of builds pass or see what the next failure is. :-P > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Cheers, > > >> > > Lincoln > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz > > <tomasz.zawadzki(a)intel.com&gt; wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi Aaron, > > >> > > > > >> > > Thank you for reporting this ! > > >> > > > > >> > > This is an issue with rte_power now depending on rte_ethdev, which > > was resolved on latest SPDK. > > >> > > > > >> > > I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK branch > > >> > > for latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK release, > > >> > > would be v21.01.x: > > >> > > https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x > > >> > > > > >> > > The fix has been backported to that branch and should be merged > > shortly: > > >> > > https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320 > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > Tomek > > >> > > > > >> > > > -----Original Message----- > > >> > > > From: dev <dev-bounces(a)dpdk.org&gt; On Behalf Of Aaron Conole > > > >> > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM > To: Brandon Lo > > >> > > <blo(a)iol.unh.edu&gt; > Cc: dpdklab(a)iol.unh.edu; ci(a)dpdk.org; > > >> > > dev(a)dpdk.org; spdk(a)lists.01.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK > > >> > > compilation failures @ DPDK community lab > > Greetings, > > > > >> > > I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation in the UNH community > > >> > > lab seems > to be failing, and I don't see an obvious reason for the > > failure. > > >> > > > The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there is a > > >> > > symbol that isn't > available when linking. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Job details (for example): > > >> > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results- > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_fil > > >> > > e/20 > 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the > > >> > > compilation of > SPDK? Maybe show the arguments to the compiler > > for the specific object? > > >> > > > Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > -Aaron > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> Brandon Lo > > >> > > >> UNH InterOperability Laboratory > > >> > > >> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 > > >> > > >> blo(a)iol.unh.edu > > >> > > >> www.iol.unh.edu >