5:07 a.m.
Hey Stephen,
Sorry for the unrelated test failure – as expected it passed the second time.
Overall the patch series looks good – I just reviewed the whole patch series and added
some comments. Appreciate you taking the time to add the cmb_copy example app!
Thanks,
-Jim
On 2/7/18, 8:05 PM, "SPDK on behalf of Liu, Changpeng"
<spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org on behalf of changpeng.liu(a)intel.com> wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I removed the -1 label, will start a new round test soon.
-----Original Message-----
From: SPDK [mailto:spdk-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Bates
Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 10:35 AM
To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [SPDK] SPDK support for NVMe CMBs and PMRs with WDS/RDS
> My v2 for the NVMe CMB WDS/RDS enablement is now up for review.
So I see my v2 series got pulled into the CI system. It *looks* like an unrelated
change is causing one test system to fail. I don't think my changes are causing
this failure but I'd appreciate it if someone with more experience could check
that.
https://ci.spdk.io/spdk/builds/review/d70dda617b40d8c099eef8313f5b959c0153
0d3e.1518046779/fedora-08/
This is the 3rd patch in the 5 patch series. I see patches 4 and 5 are getting clean
bills of health for the same tests. Does the CI tool apply each patch in turn and
then run its tests (I assume it must as patches 4 and 5 depend on the prior
patches).
Cheers
Stephen
_______________________________________________
SPDK mailing list
SPDK(a)lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk
_______________________________________________
SPDK mailing list
SPDK(a)lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk