On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
> On Saturday, November 07, 2015 10:57:17 AM Dan Williams wrote:
>> Rafael, awaiting your ack...
> Well, this seems to be entirely NFIT-related.
> Is there anything in particular you want me to look at?
This might be more relevant for a follow-on patch, but I wonder if the
core should be guaranteeing that the ->notify() callback occurs under
device_lock(). In the case of NFIT it seems possible for the notify
event to race ->add() or ->remove(), but maybe I missed some other
...and no worries if you don't see anything worth commenting on, the
bulk of this is indeed NFIT specific.