On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:54:23AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de>
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 03:33:36PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
>> region_intersects() checks if a specified region partially overlaps
>> or fully eclipses a resource identified by @name. It currently sets
>> resource flags statically, which prevents the caller from specifying
>> a non-RAM region, such as persistent memory. Add @flags so that
>> any region can be specified to the function.
>>
>> A helper function, region_intersects_ram(), is added so that the
>> callers that check a RAM region do not have to specify its iomem
>> resource name and flags. This interface is exported for modules,
>> such as the EINJ driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani(a)hpe.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma(a)intel.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/mm.h | 4 +++-
>> kernel/memremap.c | 5 ++---
>> kernel/resource.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
>> index 00bad77..c776af3 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>> @@ -362,7 +362,9 @@ enum {
>> REGION_MIXED,
>> };
>>
>> -int region_intersects(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, const char *type);
>> +int region_intersects(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, const char *type,
>> + unsigned long flags);
>> +int region_intersects_ram(resource_size_t offset, size_t size);
>>
>> /* Support for virtually mapped pages */
>> struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *addr);
>> diff --git a/kernel/memremap.c b/kernel/memremap.c
>> index 7658d32..98f52f1 100644
>> --- a/kernel/memremap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/memremap.c
>> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void *try_ram_remap(resource_size_t offset, size_t
size)
>> */
>> void *memremap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, unsigned long flags)
>> {
>> - int is_ram = region_intersects(offset, size, "System RAM");
>
> Ok, question: why do those resource things types gets identified with
> a string?! We have here "System RAM" and next patch adds "Persistent
> Memory".
>
> And "persistent memory" or "System RaM" won't work and this
is just
> silly.
>
> Couldn't struct resource have gained some typedef flags instead which we
> can much easily test? Using the strings looks really yucky.
>
At least in the case of region_intersects() I was just following
existing strcmp() convention from walk_system_ram_range.
Oh sure, I didn't mean you. I was simply questioning that whole
identify-resource-by-its-name approach. And that came with:
67cf13ceed89 ("x86: optimize resource lookups for ioremap")
I just think it is silly and that we should be identifying resource
things in a more robust way.
Btw, the ->name thing in struct resource has been there since a *long*
time, added by:
commit 40f6b7cc623f95d2a08b9adae7a6793055af4768
Author: linus1 <torvalds(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed Jun 30 11:00:00 1999 -0600
Import 2.3.11pre1
I'm not sure what it was used for, perhaps for human-readable output in
/proc/iomem.
Let me CC Linus, he would know, most likely. akpm is already on CC.
We could define 'const char *system_ram = "System
RAM"' somewhere and
then do pointer comparisons to cut down on the thrash of adding new
flags to 'struct resource'?
See above. I think flags or type_flags or so should be cleaner/better...
I could be missing some aspect though, according to which, the name is
the proper way to ident those but I can't think of one...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.