On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:58:16AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > I'll merge with your code for v3.
> Sounds, let me go rebase the __pfn_t patches on -mm so we'all lined up
> and collision free.
I'm doubt that we'll have PFN mapping ready for 4.3. I'd rather see
Ross series goes first, and move the patch to remove the size argument
from ->direct access  over to this series as well.
Yes, let's do it. The need for DAX persistence guarantees is a higher
priority than solving the DAX vs PMEM unbind bug. Especially if we
can defer __pfn_t and get some basic struct page mapping into 4.3 as