1:30 p.m.
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 3:58 AM Greg KH <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 04:01:16PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> Add a test for string stream along with a simpler example.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com>
> ---
> kunit/Kconfig | 12 ++++++
> kunit/Makefile | 4 ++
> kunit/example-test.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kunit/string-stream-test.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 165 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 kunit/example-test.c
> create mode 100644 kunit/string-stream-test.c
>
> diff --git a/kunit/Kconfig b/kunit/Kconfig
> index 64480092b2c24..5cb500355c873 100644
> --- a/kunit/Kconfig
> +++ b/kunit/Kconfig
> @@ -13,4 +13,16 @@ config KUNIT
> special hardware. For more information, please see
> Documentation/kunit/
>
> +config KUNIT_TEST
> + bool "KUnit test for KUnit"
> + depends on KUNIT
> + help
> + Enables KUnit test to test KUnit.
> +
> +config KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST
> + bool "Example test for KUnit"
> + depends on KUNIT
> + help
> + Enables example KUnit test to demo features of KUnit.
Can't these tests be module?
At this time, no. KUnit doesn't support loading tests as kernel
modules; it is something we could add in in the future, but I would
rather not open that can of worms right now. There are some other
things I would like to do that would probably be easier to do before
adding support for tests as loadable modules.
Or am I mis-reading the previous logic?
Anyway, just a question, nothing objecting to this as-is for now.
Cool
Cheers!