12:38 a.m.
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-05-14 15:16:55)
diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
index 86f65ba2bcf92..a15e6f8c41582 100644
--- a/kunit/test.c
+++ b/kunit/test.c
[..]
+
+void *kunit_kmalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ struct kunit_kmalloc_params params;
+ struct kunit_resource *res;
+
+ params.size = size;
+ params.gfp = gfp;
+
+ res = kunit_alloc_resource(test,
+ kunit_kmalloc_init,
+ kunit_kmalloc_free,
+ ¶ms);
+
+ if (res)
+ return res->allocation;
+ else
+ return NULL;
Can be written as
if (res)
return ....
return
and some static analysis tools prefer this.
+}
+
+void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct kunit_resource *resource, *resource_safe;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags);
Ah ok, test->lock is protecting everything now? Does it need to be a
spinlock, or can it be a mutex?
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(resource,
+ resource_safe,
+ &test->resources,
+ node) {
+ kunit_free_resource(test, resource);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
+}
+