On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:27:08AM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
This simply preserves the original error check in the code. This
error
check makes sure that all CPUs have the PAT feature supported when PAT
is enabled. This error can only happen when heterogeneous CPUs are
installed/emulated on the system/guest. This check may be paranoid, but
this cleanup is not meant to modify such an error check.
No, this is a ridiculous attempt to justify crazy code. Please do it
right. If the cleanup makes the code more insane than it is, then don't
do it in the first place.
Can you consider the patch 10/12-11/12 as a separate patchset from
the
WT series? If that is OK, I will resubmit 10/12 (BUG->panic) and 11/12
(commit log update).
That's not enough. 11/12 is a convoluted mess which needs splitting and
more detailed explanations in the commit messages.
So no. Read what I said: do the cleanup *first* , *then* add the new
functionality.
The WT patches shouldn't change all too much from what you have now.
Also, 11/12 changes stuff which you add in 1/12. This churn is useless
and shouldn't be there at all.
So you should be able to do the cleanup first and have the WT stuff
ontop just fine.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--