6:54 p.m.
>> I'd like to emphasize again, that I would prefer a virtio-pmem only
>> solution.
>>
>> There are architectures out there (e.g. s390x) that don't support
>> NVDIMMs - there is no HW interface to expose any such stuff.
>>
>> However, with virtio-pmem, we could make it work also on architectures
>> not having ACPI and friends.
>
> ACPI and virtio-only can share the same pmem driver. There are two
> parts to this, region discovery and setting up the pmem driver. For
> discovery you can either have an NFIT-bus defined range, or a new
> virtio-pmem-bus define it. As far as the pmem driver itself it's
> agnostic to how the range is discovered.
>
And in addition to discovery + setup, we need the flush via virtio.
> In other words, pmem consumes 'regions' from libnvdimm and the a bus
> provider like nfit, e820, or a new virtio-mechansim produce 'regions'.
>
That sounds good to me. I would like to see how the ACPI discovery
variant connects to a virtio ring.
The natural way for me would be:
A virtio-X device supplies a memory region ("discovery") and also the
interface for flushes for this device. So one virtio-X corresponds to
one pmem device. No ACPI to be involved (also not on architectures that
have ACPI)
I agree here if we discover regions with virtio-X we don't need to worry about
NFIT ACPI. Actually, there are three ways to do it with pros and cons of these
approaches:
1] Existing pmem driver & virtio for region discovery:
-----------------------------------------------------
Use existing pmem driver which is tightly coupled with concepts of namespaces, labels
etc
from ACPI region discovery and re-implement these concepts with virtio so that existing
pmem driver can understand it. In addition to this, task of pmem driver to send flush
command
using virtio.
2] Existing pmem driver & ACPI NFIT for region discovery:
----------------------------------------------------------------
- If we use NFIT ACPI, we need to teach existing ACPI driver to add this new memory
type and teach existing pmem driver to handle this new memory type. Still we need
an asynchronous(virtio) way to send flush commands. We need virtio device/driver
or arbitrary key/value like pair just to send commands from guest to host using virtio.
3] New Virtio pmem driver & paravirt device:
----------------------------------------
Third way is new virtio pmem driver with less work to support existing features of
different protocols,
and with asynchronous way of sending flush commands.
But this needs to duplicate some of the work which existing pmem driver does but as
discussed
previously we can separate common code from existing pmem driver and reuse it.
Among these approaches I also prefer 3].
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb