On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 2:06 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk(a)kernel.org&gt; wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:33:37AM +0900, bongsu.jeon2(a)gmail.com wrote: > > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk(a)kernel.org&gt; > > > > GPIOs - as returned by of_get_named_gpio() and used by the gpiolib - > > are > > signed integers, where negative number indicates error. The return > > value of of_get_named_gpio() should not be assigned to an unsigned int > > because in case of !CONFIG_GPIOLIB such number would be a valid GPIO. > > > > Fixes: c04c674fadeb ("nfc: s3fwrn5: Add driver for Samsung S3FWRN5 NFC > > Chip") > > Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org&gt; > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk(a)kernel.org&gt; > > Why do you send my patch? > I think that your patch should be applied before refactoring for this driver. So, I applied your patch to net-next branch and included your patch at my patch list. Is this the wrong process?