Tina Zhang (10):
drm/i915: Object w/o backing storage is banned by -ENXIO
drm/i915: Introduce GEM proxy
drm/i915/gvt: Add opregion support
drm/i915/gvt: Add framebuffer decoder support
vfio: ABI for mdev display dma-buf operation
drm/i915/gvt: Dmabuf support for GVT-g
drm/i915/gvt: Handle orphan dmabuf_objs
drm/i915/gvt: Introduce KBL to dma-buf on Gvt-g
drm/i915/gvt: Free dmabuf_obj list in intel_vgpu_dmabuf_cleanup
drm/i915/gvt: Refine dmabuf_obj cleanup process
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Zhang, Tina <tina.zhang(a)intel.com> wrote:
"Dma-buf support for Gvt-g" feature is queued for kernel
4.16 merge window.
Technically, this feature is able to support both remote display and local display which
depends on how to use it in userspace.
Qemu UI maintainer has cooked patches to use this feature for both remote/local display,
which would be pushed to QEMU upstream after "Dmabuf support for Gvt-g" gets
landed in kernel.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: iGVT-g [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Gizmo Chicken
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 8:47 AM
> To: Alex Ivanov <gnidorah(a)ya.ru>
> Cc: igvt-g(a)lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [iGVT-g] ETA for local graphics support?
> According to an article on Phoronix:
> "It's also looking like Linux 4.16 is when Intel GVT-g will be playing
> local VMs using GTK/SDL when paired with the changes that should be working
> their way into QEMU 2.12."
> See https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Intel-i915-
> But, yep, I hope that we'll get an official update from Intel soon.
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Alex Ivanov <gnidorah(a)ya.ru> wrote:
> > Hello.
> >> GVT-g only supports remote display not local display by this release.
> > What is the estimated time of arrival for local graphics feature?
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> > _______________________________________________
> > iGVT-g mailing list
> > iGVT-g(a)lists.01.org
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/igvt-g
> iGVT-g mailing list