I didn't see. The 3.10 seems to be possible already.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jorge Ventura <
To include the rpms in my LFS is not a problem, I can do. But as a
suggestion I think that the developers should prioritize neutral
distribution. My LFS doesn't use even linux-util, I replaced to busybox.
The idea is to have the Linux+Lustre as kind of embedded, only packages
that absolutely necessary will be installed.
Another thing is about kernel. Is not possible to have Lustre for kernel
3.10 and above? There are great features starting with version 3.10 to do
improvements for multi-core that it's not available in any version below
Thank you for your reply.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Henwood, Richard <
> On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 05:34 +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> > If you check out the sources from Git, you can build the client against
> an unpatched kernel (in the range 2.6.32 - 3.10 for master) using:
> > sh autogen.sh
> > ./configure --with-linux=/path/to/linux
> > make rpms
> 'make rpms' will give you an rpms to install, so you'll need to add rpm
> onto your Linux from Scratch.
> make install
> may be a better choice in your case... And if it is, you probably want
> to review and contribute to this issue:
> best regards,
> Intel High Performance Data Division