On Sep 24, 2015, at 9:07 PM, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
On Sep 24, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>> Anyway this does remove a lot of stuff that we don't really need in
>>>> I'll try to get it built and tested just to make sure it does not
really break anything
>>>> (unfortunately it does not seem to apply cleanly to the tip of
>>> Ok. I based the patches on top of my 37 patch series, and if you want I can
>>> upload a git branch somewhere to make rebasing easier.
>> That would be great.
>> Though in the end likely this huge patch would need to be split into smaller
>> Like if all unused llog code removal is done, that would allow subsequent
>> removal and so on.
>> But for testing a current snapshot would be great, then I can run it through my
>> to see how it fares there.
> Ok, I've pushed out the branch to
> This contains the latest version of the y2038 series (with the warning fixed
> that Sudip Mukherjee found) but no other changes, and the big code removal
> on top.
These do seem to be working fine in my testing.
Ah, and I should mention that just as I suspected, the debug log decoding tool
is very unhappy.