In general, I think that hpdd members should decide indivudally on whether they want to participate in the original lustre.org mailing lists.

I think that merging the lists is probably a non-starter, however that's up to Intel and OpenSFS to decide.

-cf


On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:15 AM, E.S. Rosenberg <esr+hpdd-discuss@mail.hebrew.edu> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Colin Faber <cfaber@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Eli,
>
> @lists.lustre.org was the original lustre community mailing lists. These
> lists were old and were not maintained until recently. They're not actively
> monitored and the goal is to shift most lustre discussion back over to them.
I realize that and I actually noticed the list @lustre I was already
on is lustre-discuss so I guess it'll remain 2 lists, but ideally it
should be 1 so no that @lustre is again maintained shouldn't hpdd
either be merged or killed so that we don't have these split
personality conversations?
>
> Likely we'll go through a period of cross posting madness until most people
> shift back to the lustre.org mailing lists.
I will try to post only to lustre-discuss starting after this message :).
Regards,
Eli
>
> -cf
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:42 AM, E.S. Rosenberg
> <esr+hpdd-discuss@mail.hebrew.edu> wrote:
>>
>> I'm going through some of the slides from LUG, am I correct if I say
>> we're supposed to switch to lustre-discuss?
>>
>> Will the old mailing lists be closed? I find it kind of ridiculous
>> that I'm going to be registered on 3 distinct mailing lists about the
>> same subject that don't get each others' mail....
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eli
>> _______________________________________________
>> HPDD-discuss mailing list
>> HPDD-discuss@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss
>
>