On Sep 25, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 25 September 2015 01:39:49 Drokin, Oleg wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 9:07 PM, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>>> Anyway this does remove a lot of stuff that we don't really
need in the client,
>>>>>> I'll try to get it built and tested just to make sure it does
not really break anything
>>>>>> (unfortunately it does not seem to apply cleanly to the tip of
>>>>> Ok. I based the patches on top of my 37 patch series, and if you want
>>>>> upload a git branch somewhere to make rebasing easier.
>>>> That would be great.
>>>> Though in the end likely this huge patch would need to be split into
>>>> Like if all unused llog code removal is done, that would allow subsequent
>>>> removal and so on.
>>>> But for testing a current snapshot would be great, then I can run it
through my testbed
>>>> to see how it fares there.
>>> Ok, I've pushed out the branch to
>>> This contains the latest version of the y2038 series (with the warning fixed
>>> that Sudip Mukherjee found) but no other changes, and the big code removal
>>> on top.
>> These do seem to be working fine in my testing.
> Ah, and I should mention that just as I suspected, the debug log decoding tool
> is very unhappy.
I have updated the branch now to reflect our discussions so far. Can you handle
forwarding the patches to Greg from there, or complain if there are still
problems with them?
Do you want me to send the y2038 patches too?
I still had problems with removing ptlrpc_update_export_timer(), so I
a small patch for that, which you probably want to do differently, and
while I split out the nontrivial parts of the large removal patch, most of
it still is in one chunk that contains purely removals of whole lines.
Ok, I'll take care of this as well.