Final Day: Lustre Usage Survey Input
by OpenSFS Administration
Hello Lustre Community,
Today is the final day to provide input on the Lustre survey. Thanks to
those who have already submitted feedback!
The OpenSFS Lustre Working Group is looking for trends in Lustre usage to
assist with future planning on releases and will present the results at LUG.
Please complete this short survey (https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GB89BM2)
to make sure your organization's voice is heard!
Response to the survey is due by March 31st. Note that all questions are
optional, so it is ok to submit a partially completed survey if you prefer
not to disclose some information.
Best regards,
OpenSFS Administration
__________________________
OpenSFS Administration
3855 SW 153rd Drive Beaverton, OR 97003 USA
Phone: +1 503-619-0561 | Fax: +1 503-644-6708
Twitter: <https://twitter.com/opensfs> @OpenSFS
Email: <mailto:admin@opensfs.org> admin(a)opensfs.org | Website:
<http://www.opensfs.org/> www.opensfs.org
3 years, 11 months
Final Week: Lustre Usage Survey Input
by OpenSFS Administration
Dear Lustre Community,
As a reminder, only 1 week remains for you to provide input on the annual
Lustre survey. The OpenSFS Lustre Working Group is looking for trends in
Lustre usage to assist with future planning on releases and will present the
results at LUG.
Please complete this short survey (https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GB89BM2)
to make sure your organization's voice is heard!
Response to the survey is due by March 31st. Note that all questions are
optional, so it is ok to submit a partially completed survey if you prefer
not to disclose some information.
Best regards,
OpenSFS Administration
__________________________
OpenSFS Administration
3855 SW 153rd Drive Beaverton, OR 97003 USA
Phone: +1 503-619-0561 | Fax: +1 503-644-6708
Twitter: <https://twitter.com/opensfs> @OpenSFS
Email: <mailto:admin@opensfs.org> admin(a)opensfs.org | Website:
<http://www.opensfs.org/> www.opensfs.org
3 years, 11 months
FW: error destroying object rc 115
by Shaw, Scott
From: Scott Shaw [mailto:sshaw@sgi.com]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 12:00 AM
To: hpdd-discuss(a)lists.01.org
Subject: error destroying object rc 115
Hi,
I sent this email to the lustre-discussion mailing list but was rejected. So I apologize if this is a duplicate posting.
We are running into an issue with one OST logging errors destroying objects and I am not familiar with the process of addressing this issue. For this OST I have migrated and redistributed the objects to other OSTs so we don't lose any user data. Below is the messages file output from the OSS server presenting the OST002d target and the errors.
/var/log/messages from the OSS server:
Mar 2 22:07:29 oss4 kernel: LustreError: 12887:0:(ofd_dev.c:1872:ofd_destroy_hdl()) sgilfs-OST002d: error destroying object [0x1002d0000:0x41799d:0x0]: -115 Mar 2 22:07:29 oss4 kernel: LustreError: 12887:0:(ofd_dev.c:1872:ofd_destroy_hdl()) Skipped 117 previous similar messages
Mar 2 22:08:11 oss4 kernel: Lustre: sgilfs-OST002d-osd: FID [0x1002d0000:0x3fa284:0x0] != self_fid [0x1002d0000:0x2d1e07:0x0]
Mar 2 22:08:11 oss4 kernel: Lustre: sgilfs-OST002d-osd: FID [0x1002d0000:0x41e662:0x0] != self_fid [0x1002d0000:0x2d1915:0x0]
Mar 2 22:08:11 oss4 kernel: Lustre: sgilfs-OST002d-o: trigger OI scrub by RPC for [0x1002d0000:0x41e662:0x0], rc = 0 [1]
Mar 2 22:08:53 oss4 kernel: Lustre: sgilfs-OST002d-osd: FID [0x1002d0000:0x3fa284:0x0] != self_fid [0x1002d0000:0x2d1e07:0x0]
Mar 2 22:08:53 oss4 kernel: Lustre: sgilfs-OST002d-osd: FID [0x1002d0000:0x41e662:0x0] != self_fid [0x1002d0000:0x2d1915:0x0]
Mar 2 22:08:53 oss4 kernel: Lustre: sgilfs-OST002d-o: trigger OI scrub by RPC for [0x1002d0000:0x41e662:0x0], rc = 0 [1] ...
{these errors keep cycling in the messages file}
>From the MDS server I initiated an LFSCK with a "-o" option so the MDT database would sync with the OST objects but oi_scrub shows no errors and the the OST oi_script cycles from completed to scanning.
I read the available documentation but I am not clear how to determine the object oi_scrub is showing an issue. Can someone help and provide a steps to fix this issue?
UUID 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
sgilfs-OST002d_UUID 15283534752 20228068 14470350844 0% /gbc-lustre[OST:45]
If I create a large 50GB sequential file I can see the used capacity increase but if I remove the file the used capacity does not decrease by 50GB.
On the MDS server oi_scrub shows no errors.
sgilfs-MDT0000]# cat oi_scrub
name: OI_scrub
magic: 0x4c5fd252
oi_files: 64
status: completed
flags:
param:
time_since_last_completed: 21180 seconds
time_since_latest_start: 22628 seconds
time_since_last_checkpoint: 21180 seconds
latest_start_position: 137533015
last_checkpoint_position: 288358401
first_failure_position: N/A
checked: 77862246
updated: 0
failed: 0
prior_updated: 0
noscrub: 40241
igif: 1
success_count: 4
run_time: 2066 seconds
average_speed: 37687 objects/sec
real-time_speed: N/A
current_position: N/A
lf_scanned: 0
lf_reparied: 0
lf_failed: 0
oss4 sgilfs-OST002d]# cat oi_scrub
name: OI_scrub
magic: 0x4c5fd252
oi_files: 64
status: completed
flags:
param:
time_since_last_completed: 344 seconds
time_since_latest_start: 346 seconds
time_since_last_checkpoint: 344 seconds
latest_start_position: 12
last_checkpoint_position: 29868033
first_failure_position: N/A
checked: 809524
updated: 0
failed: 0
prior_updated: 0
noscrub: 0
igif: 1
success_count: 2846929
run_time: 2 seconds
average_speed: 404762 objects/sec
real-time_speed: N/A
current_position: N/A
lf_scanned: 0
lf_reparied: 0
lf_failed: 0
Efsck returns no errors on the target device.
We're currently using the following releases.
Lustre release 2.7.16.11
IEEL release 3.0.1.4
OS: RHEL 7.2
e2fsprogs release 1.42.13.wc5
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Scott Shaw
4 years
Lustre Usage Survey: Input Requested
by OpenSFS Administration
Dear Lustre Community,
The OpenSFS Lustre Working Group has launched the sixth survey for
organizations using Lustre. We are looking for trends in Lustre usage to
assist with future planning on releases and will present the results at LUG.
Please complete this short survey (https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GB89BM2)
to make sure your organization's voice is heard!
Response to the survey is due by March 31st. Note that all questions are
optional, so it is ok to submit a partially completed survey if you prefer
not to disclose some information.
Best regards,
OpenSFS Administration
__________________________
OpenSFS Administration
3855 SW 153rd Drive Beaverton, OR 97003 USA
Phone: +1 503-619-0561 | Fax: +1 503-644-6708
Twitter: <https://twitter.com/opensfs> @OpenSFS
Email: <mailto:admin@opensfs.org> admin(a)opensfs.org | Website:
<http://www.opensfs.org/> www.opensfs.org
4 years
Lustre User Group 17 CFP extended to March 10th
by OpenSFS Administration
Share your experiences with colleagues. Submit an abstract to present at
LUG17. Abstracts are now due March 10, 2017.
The committee is particularly looking for presentations regarding:
* experiences running the newer community releases - 2.8 and 2.9 - in
production
* experiences using the new features in those releases (DNE2, SSK,
UID/GID mapping, etc.)
* best practices and practical experiences in deploying, monitoring
and operating Lustre
* pushing the boundaries with non-traditional deployments
Accepted abstracts will be notified in time to take advantage of early bird
registration. Submit abstracts here: https://easychair.org/cfp/LUG2017.
See the conference overview at lug17.sched.com/list/descriptions/
<https://lug17.sched.com/list/descriptions/> .
Questions about the conference? Contact pti(a)iu.edu <mailto:pti@iu.edu> .
4 years
