You might also want to ask on the LUV list about this build error. This
might be a LUV-centric issue. The LUV team ported CHIPSEC to their
system. The CHIPSEC team -- AFAIK -- has/have been using an alternative
Linux live-boot solution until recently, so the LUV team may be better
to answer a LUV-centric build question than the CHIPSEC team.
Does a 32- and 64-bit LUV behave differently, w/r/t firmware tests, on
Does CHIPSEC behave differently on when built 32- or 64-bit -- on Linux
or Windows or UEFI?
Perhaps we need LUV64-live and LUV32-live to solve??
Gettting more confused as I type, so I'll stop typing. :-)
On 10/16/2015 01:00 PM, Blibbet wrote:
On 10/14/2015 10:08 AM, Dey, Megha wrote:
> I wanted to know if the CHIPSEC test suite builds and runs on 32 bit
I don't know the cause of your problems, but the CHIPSEC PDF says
Windows x86/x64, and says that on Linux, Debian is the only one
explicitly listed with 32-bit, Fedora and Ubuntu say 64-bit, LUV entry
does not specify.
If possible to build LUV with LLVM clang, you might try that, it gives
much better warnings than GCC.
I've only built CHIPSEC on Linux, and only for 64-bit targets. And I'm
afraid I can't help building a local LUV at the moment, sorry.